Legal Opinion

Groth v. Kersting

Colorado Court of Appeals

Decided January 15, 1894PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Error to the District Court of Arapahoe County.

1Opinion of the CourtBissell, P. J.

The decision of this case requires the settlement of no *396principles, and in its legal aspects is controlled by rules from which there has seldom been a deviation in appellate procedure.

In January, 1889, Kersting & Wilmsmeier were running a brick yard for the manufacture of bricks in North Denver. Groth & Becker were at that time contractors prosecuting their business in Denver and its vicinity. Considerable dealings had been had for some little time between the two firms, and the propriety of a union of their interests and business seems to have occurred to the parties. As a result, Kersting &…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mining Co. v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  2. STANDARD ACCIDENT INS. CO. v. FRIEDENTHAL.Colorado Court of Appeals · 1891
  3. Kimball v. LyonSupreme Court of Colorado · 1893

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Perdew v. Creditors of the Estate of CoffinColorado Court of Appeals · 1898
  2. Perdew v. Creditors of the Estate of CoffinColorado Court of Appeals · 1898

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API