Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fowler v. Park Corp.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided July 17, 1984No. 65313Published

1DissentWelliver, Judge

I respectfully dissent.

In my opinion the trial court erred in submitting this case under a theory of negligent entrustment. The evidence shows that defendant for several years leased an old engine to Railcar and that this engine was under the control of Railcar at all times. In the fall of 1980, defendant purchased a new engine and thereafter agreed to loan it to Railcar, after 4 p.m. each day. There was no evidence before the jury suggesting that defendant knew or had reason to know that Railcar employed persons who were not fully trained to operate the engine at the time this arrangement…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Sampson v. W. F. Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Bell v. GreenSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968
  3. Newson v. City of Kansas CityMissouri Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Evans v. Allen Auto Rental & Truck Leasing, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1977
  5. James Hetherton and Carol Hetherton, His Wife v. Sears, Roebuck & Company, a New York CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1979

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API