Legal Opinion

Burstiner v. City of East Orange

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided March 14, 1924Published

1Per curiam

This writ of certiorari seeks the review of a certain assessment for special benefits against the lands of the prosecutors for the widening of North Harrison street at its junction with Main street, in the city of East Orange.

As a part of such improvement lands of the prosecutors John F. Cronen and Charles H. Thorne and wife were taken. AH the proceedings were taken and conducted under the Home Rule act. Pamph. L. 1917, ch. 152, p. 319, and amendment, Pamph. L. 1918, ch. 163, and amendment, Pamph. L. 1921, ch. 195, p. 511.

Fifteen reasons are assigned why the assessment should he set aside,…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Graham v. City of Ocean CitySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1923
  2. Robinson v. Borough of EdgewaterSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API