Legal Opinion

Marker v. United States

District Court, D. Idaho

Decided June 10, 1930No. 1054Published

1Opinion of the Court

CAVANAH, District Judge.

This suit is now before the court upon issues of fact presented by the second amended complaint, answer of defendant, reply of plaintiff, the evidence appearing in a stipulation and oral testimony taken. A demurrer to the first ameixded complaint was sustained upon the ground that it appeared therefrom *458that plaintiff, on July 1, 1927, converted the original poliey into a five-year life insurance poliey, and .that his rights, if any, were on the converted policy and not on the original poliey, and in the absence of actionable fraud or mistake the contract of converted…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. United States v. GoldenCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1929
  2. United States v. BuzardCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  3. United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
  4. Marker v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Idaho · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API