McMillan v. Rushing
Supreme Court of Alabama
Appeal from the Chancery Court of Sumpter. Heard before the Hon. Tiiomas Cobbs. The facts sufficiently appear in the opinion of the Court.
1Opinion of the CourtClopton, J.
The subject-matter of the suit is an account of the personal property which came to the possession of McPherson as administrator de bonis non with the will annexed of the estate of M. B. Taylor, and a recovery of the lands sold by him as such administrator, under a decree of fhe Probate Court; which personal and real property was bequeathed and devised to the children of D. M. Taylor, who were living at the time the will was made, and at the time it went into effect. The testator died in 1861, and D. M. Taylor was appointed and qualified as executor of his will, and acted as such until his…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- James v. JamesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
- Calloway v. GilmerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1860
- Foxworth v. WhiteSupreme Court of Alabama · 1882
- State Bank v. EllisSupreme Court of Alabama · 1857
- Smith v. PerrySupreme Court of Alabama · 1876
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Hill v. MooreTexas Supreme Court · 1892
- Wood v. Holly Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- Courson v. TollisonSupreme Court of Alabama · 1933
- Rucker v. Tennessee Coal, Iron & RailroadSupreme Court of Alabama · 1912
- Meeks v. MillerSupreme Court of Alabama · 1926
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.