Legal Opinion
United States v. Paul Thomas Kinter
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
Decided December 19, 2000No. 99-4621PublishedCited by 145 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Affirmed by published opinion. Judge NIEMEYER wrote the opinion, in which Judge TRAXLER and Chief Judge STAMP joined.
OPINION
NIEMEYER, Circuit Judge:
For his bribery-related convictions, Paul Kinter was sentenced to 46 months imprisonment, a term based on the amount of benefit that a- government contractor received as a result of the bribes rather than the lesser amount of benefit that Kinter personally received from the scheme. It is this lesser amount that Kinter contends is appropriate to consider under U.S.S.G. § 2Cl.l(b)(2)(A). Because the Sentencing Guidelines’ general application…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
- Pinkerton v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
- United States v. WattsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by145 opinions
- United States v. David C. Hughes, the Office of the Federal Public Defender, Amicus SupportingCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Richard HicksCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Francisco D. Pineiro, Also Known as Frank PineiroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. McNairCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2010
- United States v. Benjamin General, A/K/A BarkimCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2002
140 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.