Hammel v. C. M. Hill Lumber Co.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
1 Reported in 232 N.W. 40, 234 N.W. 674. Action by the plaintiff to recover royalty upon a mining lease. There were two causes of action. The defendant answered separately to each. The court sustained the plaintiff's demurrer to the answer to the first. It overruled his demurrer to the answer to the second. The defendant appeals from the order sustaining the plaintiff's demurrer to the first cause. The plaintiff appeals from the order overruling his demurrer to the defendant's answer to the second cause.
1. The first cause of action goes to the right of the defendant, under facts somewhat…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- First National Bank v. St. Anthony & Dakota Elevator Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
- Hoffman v. MurphySupreme Court of Colorado · 1908
- Hammel v. C. M. Hill Lumber Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1930