Thompson v. Village of Whitefish Bay
Wisconsin Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtFritz, C. J.
Appellants contend that the allegations in the petition for the writ of mandamus do not state sufficient facts in relation to the requirement in sec. 10.43 (1), Stats., to show that the prescribed percentage of electors of the village have signed the petition for the enactment of the proposed charter ordinance, which is to be adopted by the village board without alteration or referred by the board to a vote of the electors of the village; and in relation to the filing of the petition with the village clerk and her action, and the vote of the board not to pass the ordinance or to submit it to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. HartwellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- United States v. GermaineSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- In re the Appointment of a Revisor of the StatutesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1910
- State ex rel. Brown County v. MyersWisconsin Supreme Court · 1881
- State ex rel. Lewis v. Board of Public WorksSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1889
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Honulik v. Town of GreenwichSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2009
- Otey v. Common Council of City of MilwaukeeDistrict Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 1968
- Mount Horeb Community Alert v. Village Board of Mt. HorebWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
- Save Our Fire Department Paramedics Committee v. City of AppletonCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1986
- Gramling v. City of WauwatosaWisconsin Supreme Court · 1969
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.