Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Hill

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 8, 1985No. 801PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge:

In this case, appellant was convicted of theft, false reports to law enforcement authorities and criminal conspiracy; in this appeal, he seeks either discharge or a new trial. The circumstances from which the charges stem are as follows:

On December 8, 1981, defendant Hill and Selwyn Spearin were truck drivers returning to their employer from a delivery in the South. They held $12,000 in cash, payment for goods delivered. At a truck stop near Erie, they left their truck and bought coffee; Spearin left the shop before Hill and returned to the truck. He claims he saw a person…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. KloiberSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  2. Commonwealth v. TwiggsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. Commonwealth v. ClemmonsSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. StaffordSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Commonwealth v. JoynerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1976

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. GroveSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  2. Commonwealth v. JacksonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  3. Commonwealth v. DoaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. ManhartSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  5. Commonwealth v. DillonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API