Legal Opinion

Office of Lawyer Regulation v. William J. Grogan

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided June 19, 2014No. 2012AP002361-DPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

¶ 1. We review the recommendation of the referee, Reserve Judge Robert E. Kinney, that the license of Attorney William J. Grogan to practice law in Wisconsin be revoked due to professional misconduct. The referee also recommended that Attorney Grogan be ordered to pay restitution and the costs of this proceeding. Attorney Grogan did not timely appeal the report and recommendation.

¶ 2. We adopt the referee's findings of fact and conclusions of law and agree that the seriousness of Attorney Grogan's professional misconduct warrants the revocation of his law license. We further agree that he…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. In the Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against WiduleWisconsin Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Matter of Disciplinary Proceedings Against InglimoWisconsin Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. GroganWisconsin Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Terry L. ConstantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022
  2. Office of Lawyer Regulation v. Terry L. ConstantWisconsin Supreme Court · 2022

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API