In Re Marriage of Levingston
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
KING, J.
In this case we hold that when a retirement plan administrator determines that a marital judgment dividing community interests in the plan is not a qualified domestic relations order (QDRO) as defined by federal law, state and federal courts have concurrent jurisdiction to review that determination.
In 1988, the Laborers Pension Trust Fund for Northern California (Fund) was joined as a party claimant 1 in the marital dissolution proceeding between Clevon and Leola Levingston. 2 (Civ. Code, § 4363.1.) In 1989, the Fund began paying pension benefits to Clevon. On March 7, 1991,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In Re Marriage of FlahertyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Lembo v. Texaco, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1987
- In Re Marriage of OlivarezCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1986
3Cited by10 opinions
- Geiger v. Foley Hoag LLP Retirement PlanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2008
- Oddino v. OddinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- Tomaselli v. Transamerica InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Barkley v. City of Blue LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Garcia v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsHawaii Supreme Court · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.