Legal Opinion

Shelby Mutual Insurance Company v. Schuitema

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided January 6, 1967No. 35260PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

193 So.2d 435 (1967)

SHELBY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, an Ohio Corporation, Authorized to Do Business in the State of Florida, Petitioner,

v.

Henry SCHUITEMA, Respondent.

No. 35260.

Supreme Court of Florida.

January 6, 1967.

Carey, Dwyer, Austin, Cole & Stephens and Edward A. Perse, Miami, for petitioner.

Jones, Adams, Paine & Foster, West Palm Beach, for respondent.

2Per curiam

The petition for writ of certiorari, having shown jurisdictional conflict, seeks review of the decision of the District Court of Appeal, Fourth District, reported at 183 So.2d 571.

The rule of the District Court of Appeal, Third District,…

3Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Shelby Mutual Insurance Co. v. SchuitemaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  2. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co. v. Imperial Casualty & Indemnity Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  3. Florida Bar v. CohenSupreme Court of Florida · 1967

4Cited by8 opinions

  1. Ratner v. Canadian Universal Ins. Co. Ltd.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1971
  2. Barnette v. Hartford Insurance GroupWyoming Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Transit Casualty Co. v. Hartman's Inc.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1978
  4. Zenti v. Home Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1978
  5. Pennsylvania National Mutual Casualty Insurance v. BiermanCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1972

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API