Legal Opinion

Barnette v. Hartford Insurance Group

Wyoming Supreme Court

Decided November 19, 1982No. 5687PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROSE, Chief Justice.

A judgment against Gibson A. Barnette (the appellant here) in favor of Michael L. Doyle was affirmed by this court in Barnette v. Doyle, Wyo., 622 P.2d 1349 (1981). Mr. Barnette then brought this action against The Hartford Insurance Group, Hake Agency and Barnette Enterprises, Inc., a Wyoming corporation, seeking indemnity for the loss he suffered as a consequence of the Doyle judgment. The complaint against Hartford asked for a construction of Hartford’s automobile liability insurance policy issued to Barnette Enterprises, Inc., as the named insured, and sought damages…

2Cases cited43 opinions

  1. Barnette v. DoyleWyoming Supreme Court · 1981
  2. Greaves v. Public Service Mutual InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1959
  3. Pullen v. Employers' Liability Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1956
  4. Pleasant Valley Lima Bean Growers & Warehouse Ass'n v. Cal-Farm InsuranceCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Commercial Standard Insurance Co. v. American General Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1970

38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Teddy Ray DyerCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1994
  2. BP America, Inc. v. State Auto Property & Casualty Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 2005
  3. Tri-S Corp. v. Western World Insurance Co.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Katina Piatt v. Indiana Lumbermen's Mutual Insurance CompanySupreme Court of Missouri · 2015
  5. Shelter Mutual Insurance Co. v. BrooksSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API