Buck Ridge Coal Mining Co. v. Rosoff Engineering Co.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Per curiam
For the reasons stated in the opinion in Buck Ridge Coal Mining Co. v. Rosoff E. Co., Appeal No. 1 (215 App. Div. 441), herewith handed down, the order appealed from should be reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and the motion of the defendant, respondent, denied, with ten dollars costs, and the plaintiff’s cross-motion for leave to bring in and join Charles H. Welles, Jr., as a party plaintiff granted, with ten dollars costs.
Present — Clarke, P. J., Merrell, Finch, Martin and Burr, JJ.
Ordered reversed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion of defendant,…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Buck Ridge Coal Mining Co. v. Rosoff Engineering Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1926