Legal Opinion

Trenouth v. San Francisco

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided January 19, 1880No. 141PublishedCited by 28 opinions

Error- to the Supreme Court.of tbe State of California. Tbe facts are stated in tbe opinion of tbe court.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Field

This was a suit to charge tbe defendants as trustees of certain land in tbe city of San Francisco, and to compel a conveyance of tbe legal title to the plaintiff; Tbe case is free from difficulty, but to understand tbe positions of tbe plaintiff it will be necessary to state briefly tbe history of the titles to lands in that city.

At tbe time of tbe conquest’ of California by tbe forces of tbe United States, on tbe 7th of July, 1846, there was a Mexican pueblo at tbe site of tbe present city of San Francisco. This term “ pueblo,” in its original signification, means people or population, but…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Grisar v. McDowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  2. Townsend v. GreeleySupreme Court of the United States · 1867

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Clipper Mining Co. v. Eli Mining & Land Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1904
  2. San Francisco City and County v. Le RoySupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  3. Cosmos Exploration Co. v. Gray Eagle Oil Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1901
  4. Wallace v. AdamsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1906
  5. Thallmann v. ThomasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1901

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API