Legal Opinion

Matter of Berry v. Brearton

New York Court of Appeals

Decided January 9, 1934PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Relator, an honorably discharged soldier, was discharged in January, 1932, from his position in the service of the city of Schenectady by the Commissioner of Public Works without cause and without being given a hearing. He commenced this mandamus proceeding to procure his reinstatement in July, 1932, about six months after his discharge. Respondents set up the defense of laches. Relator offered excuses for the delay which justified the court in deciding that the delay under the circumstances did not constitute laches which required the dismissal of the proceeding.

The Special Term decided the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People Ex Rel. Gas-Light Co. v. . Common CouncilNew York Court of Appeals · 1879
  2. McDougall v. . ShoemakerNew York Court of Appeals · 1923

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Grasso v. BreartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  2. Malkenson v. Journal-News Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1946
  3. Matter of Bottleburger v. BreartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  4. Matter of Buckley v. BreartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
  5. Matter of Burgey v. BreartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1934

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API