Malkenson v. Journal-News Corp.
New York Court of Appeals
1Per curiam
We think the allegations of the complaint were sufficient to require an exercise of the court’s discretion under rule 212 of the Rules of Civil Practice (Civ. Prac. Act, § 473) and that the court erred in dismissing the complaint “ upon the law ” (Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New York, 289 N. Y. 45). There is nothing upon the face of the contract to indicate an illegal invasion of the powers of the directors. What the plaintiff sought was a declaration of legal rights flowing from acts of the directors. The Appellate Division having reversed and dismissed the complaint upon the…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Rockland Light and Power Co. v. City of New YorkNew York Court of Appeals · 1942
- Newburger v. LubellNew York Court of Appeals · 1931
- Matter of Berry v. BreartonNew York Court of Appeals · 1934
- Batchelar v. BatchelarNew York Court of Appeals · 1927
3Cited by1 opinion
- Teperman v. AmronAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1959