Whittaker v. N. Y. & Harlem R. R.
The Superior Court of New York City
Motion to vacate sastisfaction of judgment and for further relief. The material facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
This is a motion made by Ghauncey S. Truax, attorney for the plaintiff herein, for an order vacating and setting aside the satisfaction of the judgment for $10,646.73 entered herein March 24, 1884, in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant, and for other and further relief. The satisfaction took place upon a satisfaction piece executed by the plaintiff purporting to have been executed August 4,1886, and filed ip. the office of the clerk of this court October 7, 1886.
The papers submitted on both sides are quite voluminous, but there is no substantial conflict as to the material facts…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Coughlin v. . N.Y.C. and H.R.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1877
- Fowler v. . CallanNew York Court of Appeals · 1886
- Albert Palmer Co. v. Van OrdenThe Superior Court of New York City · 1882
- Quincey v. FrancisNew York Supreme Court · 1878
- McCabe v. FoggThe Superior Court of New York City · 1880
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Guliano v. WhitenackNew York Court of Common Pleas · 1894
- Howitt v. MerrillNew York Court of Appeals · 1889