Legal Opinion

McCabe v. Fogg

The Superior Court of New York City

Decided July 15, 1880PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.

Under the old Oode the lien of an attorney for compensation did not exist before verdict or judgment, except on the papers in his hands. It was only in the case of a settlement privately effected between the parties with the design of defrauding the attorney that the court could, as shown in Dietz agt. McCallum (44 How., 493), and the cases therein referred to, insist upon the payment to him of a least the taxable costs, before granting a discontinuance or leave to serve supplemental answer showing settlement. The Oode of Civil Procedure, as originally passed, did not change the law upon this…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Quincey v. FrancisNew York Supreme Court · 1878

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. In re WilsonDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1882
  2. Whittaker v. N. Y. & Harlem R. R.The Superior Court of New York City · 1886
  3. Smith v. ChenowethCity of New York Municipal Court · 1886
  4. Stahl v. WadsworthSuperior Court of Buffalo · 1887

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API