Legal Opinion
Lamb v. Rochester General Hospital
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 22, 1987PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order unanimously modified, on the law, and as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The order of Special Term should be modified with respect to the items requested in paragraphs 17 and 18 of defendant Spital’s demand for a bill of particulars, by striking plaintiff’s responses thereto and directing service of a new bill of particulars, with leave to plaintiff to file a supplemental bill 30 days after completion of discovery proceedings. In this medical malpractice action plaintiff served identical bills of particulars on the several defendants:…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- McKenzie v. St. Elizabeth HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
- Nelson v. New York University Medical CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
- Brynes v. New York HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Nuss v. Pettibone Mercury Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
- McLaughlin v. CharlesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3Cited by8 opinions
- Marsala v. WeinraubAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- Miccarelli v. FleissAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- Laukaitis v. Ski Stop, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- State v. General Electric Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- Martinovics v. New York City Health & Hospitals Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.