Cameron v. Cameron

—Judgment unanimously modified on the law and as modified affirmed without costs in accordance with the following Memorandum: The amount of maintenance awarded to plaintiff reflects an appropriate balancing of plaintiffs needs and defendant’s ability to pay, and we decline to disturb Supreme Court’s exercise of discretion (see, Fischer v Fischer, 199 AD2d 1028, 1029; Torgersen v Torgersen, 188 AD2d 1023, 1024, Iv denied 81 NY2d 709). The court did not err in failing to include plaintiffs receipt of either Social Security benefits or disability payments through Social Security *926Supplemental…