Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Fanno

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 27, 1893PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Washington County; Frank J. Taylor, Judge. Action by A. H. Johnson against A. R. Fanno to recover possession of real property. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant appeals.

1Per curiam

This is an appeal from a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and against the defendant, in an action to recover possession of real property. *515The assignments of error in the notice of appeal are as follows: “1. Error of the court, committed at the trial of this cause, in admitting testimony offered by the plaintiff, and objected to by the defendant. 2. Error of the court, committed at the trial of this cause, in excluding testimony offered on behalf of the defendant, and objected to by the plaintiff. 3. Error of the court, committed at the trial of this cause, in giving instructions…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Herbert v. DufurOregon Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Archbishop v. HackOregon Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. McDonald v. North River InsuranceIdaho Supreme Court · 1923

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API