Legal Opinion

Bank of California v. King County

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided November 12, 1936No. 1138PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BOWEN, District Judge.

National banks are instrumentalities of the federal government, and states and counties are without power to tax the personal property'of such banks. 12 U.S.C.A. § 548; Owensboro National Bank v. Owensboro, 173 U.S. 664, 19 S.Ct. 537, 43 L.Ed. 850; Chase National Bank v. Spokane County, 125 Wash. 1, 215 P. 374.

In Aberdeen Savings & Loan Association v. Chase, 157 Wash. 351, at page 372, 289 P. 536, 545, 290 P. 697, 71 A.L.R. 232, the court said: “It is, of coursé, truc that a' state cannot tax a national bank without authority from Congress, and then only strictly…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Owensboro National Bank v. OwensboroSupreme Court of the United States · 1899
  2. First Nat. Bank of Guthrie Center v. AndersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
  3. Allen v. Baltimore & Ohio RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  4. Aberdeen Savings & Loan Ass'n v. ChaseWashington Supreme Court · 1930
  5. Chase National Bank v. Spokane CountyWashington Supreme Court · 1923

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. O'Neil v. Valley Nat. Bank of PhoenixArizona Supreme Court · 1942
  2. First National Bank & Trust Co. v. McDonaldDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 1968

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API