Legal Opinion

Schmidt v. Leben

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1971No. Civ. 8568PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KNUDSON, Judge.

This is an action for damages for malicious prosecution, the plaintiff charging that the criminal proceedings were instituted without probable cause and with malice; that he was damaged in the sum of $2,000 actual damages; and for the further sum of $5,000 punitive damages.

'The defendants answered jointly, and except for admitting the corporate capacity of the defendant Bismarck Super Market and that Leonard Leben was the manager, as alleged, and admitting to making the complaint, they denied having acted at any time without probable cause and with malice, and denied all other…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Turner v. MellonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Miller v. FanoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  3. Nicholson v. RoopNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1954
  4. Knauss v. Miles Homes, Inc.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1969
  5. Mielke Ex Rel. Mielke v. RodeNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Shires v. CobbOregon Supreme Court · 1975
  3. Sabag v. Continental South DakotaSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1985

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API