Murray v. Insurance Company of North America
Court of Appeals of Texas
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MASSEY, Chief Justice.
The question presented on appeal is whether the event made requisite as the condition of payment of insurance benefits has occurred. Although the jury returned answers to special issues submitted in favor of the plaintiff — albeit none of such issues posed the ultimate question — the trial court rendered judgment non obstante ve-redicto for the defendant insurance company.
We affirm.
The insurance payable in the event of liability was termed the “principal sum”. By language in the policy the “principal sum” was payable in the event of either the death of the insured…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Sextet Local Mutual Aid Ass'n v. CovingtonTexas Commission of Appeals · 1929
- Williams v. Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & EnginemenTexas Commission of Appeals · 1927
- Eminent Household of Columbian Woodmen v. HancockCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1915
- Covington v. Sextet Local Mut. Aid Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1928
3Cited by6 opinions
- James B. Francis, Jr. v. Ina Life Insurance Company of New York, a Cigna Company, A/K/A LiconyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1987
- Martha Valerio v. Home Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- James J. Reid v. Life Insurance Company of North America, Inc., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Juhlin v. Life Insurance Co. of North AmericaSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
- Becktell v. Allstate Life InsuranceDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1986
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.