Legal Opinion

Miller v. Ballentine

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 27, 1967No. 5-4125PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Lyle Brown, Justice.

Julian and Nedra Miller d/b/a Home Finance Company, brought this action to recover under a conditional sale contract. Defendant, Pat Ballentine, executed the contract in favor of Nevels Furniture Company and the latter in turn assigned and sold the contract to Home Finance Company. On its face the instrument appeared in proper form, containing a list of furniture, the time price, monthly payments., etc., payable at the office of Home Finance Company. Ballentine defended on the ground that he received no merchandise or money in consideration of his executing the contract,…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Davis v. SelfSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Bill C. Harris Construction Co. v. PowersSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  2. Swink & Co. v. Carroll McEntee & McGinley, Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1979
  3. Love v. H. F. Construction Co.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1977
  4. Vangilder v. FaulkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968
  5. Vangilder v. FaulkSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1968

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API