Smith v. Gadd
Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)
1Opinion of the Court
CLAY, Commissioner.
This controversy presents the question of what constitutés an “appearance” in a civil action’within the meaning of CR 55.01.
The plaintiffs werq. granted a default judgment against-the defendants on motion made without, notice. Under CR 55.01, if t-he defendants had “appeared in .the action” they were entitled to at least three days’ written notice prior to the hearing on the motion.
Plaintiffs brought suit on May 20, 1954 to1 enjoin the defendants from using a private passway across the plaintiffs’ land. On the same date a restraining order was issued by the. clerk and…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Ken-Mar Airpark Inc. v. Toth Aircraft & Accessories Co.District Court, W.D. Missouri · 1952
- Brumleve v. CronanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1917
- Marcum v. CommonwealthCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1938
- Robinson v. RobinsonNew York Supreme Court · 1924
- Stevens v. Jas. A. Smith Lumber Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1929
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Austin v. State Ex Rel. HermanCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1969
- McGowan v. McGowanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1983
- First National Bank of Cincinnati v. HartmannCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1988
- Ryan v. CollinsCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1972
- Soileau v. BowmanCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 2012
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.