Legal Opinion
In Re Hot-Hed Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 30, 2007No. 06-20893PublishedCited by 159 opinions
1Per curiam
Petitioner Hot-Hed Inc. (“Hot-Hed”) requests a writ of mandamus (1) vacating the district court’s order denying Hot-Hed’s motion for remand to state court for lack of federal jurisdiction, and (2) ordering the district court to remand to state court. As we hold that Hob-Hed’s request for attorneys’ fees in its complaint in state court does not have the legal effect of presenting a federal question, we grant the petition in part, vacating the order of the district court to the extent that it found the existence of federal question jurisdiction and remanding to the district court with…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. Construction Laborers Vacation Trust for Southern Cal.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Schlagenhauf v. HolderSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Acuna v. Brown & Root Inc.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2000
- Medina v. Ramsey Steel Co IncCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2001
- Carpenter v. Wichita Falls Independent School DistrictCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1995
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by159 opinions
- Gutierrez v. FloresCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- John Quinn v. Jesus GuerreroCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
- Bernhard v. Whitney National BankCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2008
- Perfecto Valencia v. Allstate Texas Lloyd'sCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2020
- Rebekah GeeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2019
154 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.