Legal Opinion · Concurrence

State v. Martin

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 2, 2017No. CR-16-365Published

1ConcurrenceJohn Dan Kemp, Chief Justice

The majority opinion “examine[s] the basis of the circuit court’s ruling [to acquit Martin] in light of prevailing law” and proceeds to reach the merits of the State’s argument. I concur with the majority’s disposition to dismiss the appeal but write separately to provide a wholly different analysis. Because the circuit court’s grant of Martin’s motion for directed verdict turned on the application of the law to the facts, I would dismiss for lack of a proper State appeal.

Pursuant to Rule 3 of the Arkansas Rules of Appellate Procedure-Criminal, the right of appeal by the State is limited.…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. StephensonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  2. State v. BanksSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  3. Fowler v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2010
  4. State v. GraySupreme Court of Arkansas · 2016
  5. State v. AudSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API