Legal Opinion

Anderson v. Pennock

District Court, C.D. Illinois

Decided April 14, 2020No. 4:19-cv-04215Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF ILLINOIS ANTHONY ASHFORD and ) BRIAN ANDERSON, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) No.: 19-cv-4215-MMM ) WANDA PENNOCK, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) MERIT REVIEW ORDER Plaintiffs, proceeding pro se and detained in the Rushville Treatment and Detention Center, seek leave to proceed in forma pauperis. The "privilege to proceed without posting security for costs and fees is reserved to the many truly impoverished litigants who, within the District Court's sound discretion, would remain without legal remedy if such privilege were not afforded to them."…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Gregory Turley v. Dave RednourCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  2. Michael Alexander v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2013
  3. Grieveson v. AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
  4. Charles COLLINS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. D.J. KIBORT and Educational Therapy Center, Defendants-AppellantsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1998
  5. Robert L. Brewster v. North American Van Lines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API