Rowland v. City of Greencastle
Indiana Supreme Court
From Putnam Circuit Court; 8. M. McGregor, Judge. Action by city of Greencastle against Daniel B, Rowland to recover penalty for violation of city ordinance.
1Opinion of the CourtDowling, J.
This action was commenced before the mayor of the city of Greencastle. The complaint charged the appellant with keeping and maintaining a room for the sale of spirituous and other intoxicating liquors to be used upon the premises where sold, within the residence or suburban *593portion of the said city, and outside of the boundaries of the business district thereof, in violation of an ordinance of said city adopted February 8, 1898. From a judgment against him in the mayor’s court, the defendant appealed to the Putnam Circuit Court. A plea in abatement was held insufficient. A demurrer to the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Shea v. City of MuncieIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Green v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
- Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. City of NoblesvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896
3Cited by9 opinions
- Villalobos v. HolguinTexas Supreme Court · 1948
- Pittsburgh, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co. v. MacyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1915
- State Ex Rel. Casey's General Stores, Inc. v. City Council of SalemMissouri Court of Appeals · 1985
- City of Greencastle v. ThompsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1907
- Snelling & Snelling, Inc. v. ParnellCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1968
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.