Legal Opinion

Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. City of Noblesville

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided September 24, 1896No. 2,262PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Prom the Clinton Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtGavin, J.

In a suit to recover the penalty for a violation of a city ordinance, so much of the ordinance as relates to the offense must be referred to in *21the complaint by number of the section or sections and date of adoption. Green v. City of Indianapolis, 25 Ind. 490; Clevenger v. Town of Rushville, 90 Ind. 258; Burns’ R. S. 1894, section 3501.

Where, however, one section of an ordinahce defines the offense and fixes the penalty, while the following section merely provides for the mode of publication, it is necessary to designate in the complaint only the former section and not the latter.

In such an…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Green v. City of IndianapolisIndiana Supreme Court · 1865
  2. Clevenger v. Town of RushvilleIndiana Supreme Court · 1883
  3. Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. City of NoblesvilleIndiana Court of Appeals · 1896

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rowland v. City of GreencastleIndiana Supreme Court · 1902
  2. City of Greensburg v. Cleveland, Cincinnati, Chicago & St. Louis Railway Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1899

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API