Legal Opinion
People v. Dais
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 22, 1995PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant was convicted of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree (Penal Law § 220.16 [1]) for possessing a quantity of cocaine with intent to sell. Viewing the evidence, as we must, in the light most favorable to the People (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620, 621), we conclude that there is sufficient evidence to establish that defendant possessed the plastic baggie containing the smaller bags of cocaine that were found where defendant had been placed after the vehicle in which he was a passenger had been stopped (see,…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- People v. ContesNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. AlvinoNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. MarinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1990
- People v. TaylorAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. CarsonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. LawsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
- People v. MaddoxAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- Redmond v. City of White PlainsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010