Legal Opinion

Templeton v. . Beard

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided April 24, 1912PublishedCited by 30 opinions

Appeal from Ferguson, 'Jat January Term, 1912, of IREDELL. Civil action beard on demurrer to tbe complaint. There was judgment sustaining demurrer, and plaintiff excepted and^ appealed. Tbe facts are sufficiently stated in tbe opinion of tbe Court by'.MV. Justice Hoke.

1Opinion of the CourtHoke, J.

Tbe plaintiff instituted suit against P. B. Beard and four others, and for her cause of action alleged “that, during tbe period referred to, defendants were tbe duly qualified and acting Commissioners of Rowan County, N. 0. That on tbe . day of May, 1909, tbe public road leading east from Mount Ulla, in Rowan County, was and bad been for several months past in a dangerous and unsafe condition at tbe point where it crosses Back Creek, and was a menace to tbe imb-lic passing over said road because of tbe great need of a bridge across said creek, which fact was well known to defendants above…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. White v. Commissioners of ChowanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  2. Katzenstein v. Raleigh & Gaston RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1881
  3. Raynsford v. PhelpsMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
  4. Baker v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1867
  5. Bray v. . CreekmoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1891

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by30 opinions

  1. Meyer v. WallsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1997
  2. Smith v. HefnerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  3. Epps v. Duke University, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1996
  4. Longstreet v. County of MecostaMichigan Supreme Court · 1924
  5. Hopkins v. . BarnhardtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API