Legal Opinion

Schnebly v. Bryson

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 21, 1930No. 22234. En BancPublishedCited by 15 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMain, J.

This action was brought to recover damages for personal injuries. The cause came on for trial before the court and a jury. At the conclusion of all of the evidence, the defendant moved for a directed verdict, which motion was sustained. Judgment was entered dismissing the action, from which the plaintiff appeals.

The facts are these: The respondents are husband and wife, own an automobile which was purchased for a family purpose, and reside in the city of Walla Walla. Whitman College is located in the same city. On the evening of November 24, 1928, the young men of one of the college…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Ludberg v. BarghoornWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Knust v. BullockWashington Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Burger v. Taxicab Motor Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Kneff v. SanfordWashington Supreme Court · 1911

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. Reynolds v. State Board of EqualizationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1946
  2. Monaghan v. Standard Motor Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1934
  3. Cameron v. DownsCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1982
  4. Bates v. TirkWashington Supreme Court · 1934
  5. Forman v. ShieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1935

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API