Knust v. Bullock
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Irwin, J., entered October 27, 1909, upon the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action for damages.
1Opinion of the CourtMount, J.
This action was brought by the respondent to recover damages for the loss of a horse, and for injuries to a wagon and harness, caused by another team of horses running away and colliding with the team belonging to the respondent. The cause was tried to the court and a jury. A verdict was returned in favor of the respondent for $245, against appellants Bullock and wife, the owners of the team which ran away, and against James Harvey, the driver *142thereof. This appeal is prosecuted by Bullock and wife from a judgment upon the verdict. Defendant Harvey has not appealed.
The complaint alleged, in…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Norris v. . KohlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1869
- Edgeworth v. WoodSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1896
- Seaman v. . KoehlerNew York Court of Appeals · 1890
- Schulte v. HollidayMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
3Cited by37 opinions
- Ferris v. . SterlingNew York Court of Appeals · 1915
- Birch v. AbercrombieWashington Supreme Court · 1913
- Mitchell v. ChurchesWashington Supreme Court · 1922
- Bradley v. S. L. Savidge, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 1942
- Ludberg v. BarghoornWashington Supreme Court · 1913
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.