Legal Opinion

Peurifoy v. Hood Rubber Products Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided April 14, 1933No. 1089PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LESLIE, Justice.

The plaintiff, Hood Rubber Products Company, a Delaware corporation, instituted this .suit against J. M. Peurifoy, R. D. Morris, and J. M. Cook and the Peurifoy-Morris Tire Company, a partnership composed of said individuals, for the balance due on certain alleged accounts. The defendants answered by exceptions, verified denial, and set up counterclaims. Trial was before the court without a jury, and at the conclusion thereof judgment was rendered in favor of the plaintiff, and the defendants were denied recovery ■on their cross-action. The defendants appeal. The court has…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Farm & Home Savings & Loan Ass'n of Missouri v. MuhlCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  2. Harrison v. BirrellOregon Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Security Co. v. Panhandle National BankTexas Supreme Court · 1900
  4. Dodson v. WatsonTexas Supreme Court · 1920
  5. Ware v. ManningSupreme Court of Alabama · 1888

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Davis v. GilmoreCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Central Nat. Bank of San Angelo v. CoxCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Continental Casualty Co. v. Dr Pepper Bottling Co. of Texas, Inc.District Court, N.D. Texas · 2006
  4. Eastern Development & Investment Corp. v. City of San AntonioCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1977
  5. Wilson v. Clarke Floor MacHine CompanyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1964

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API