Legal Opinion · Dissent
Greg R. Barringer and Judith M. Barringer v. Michael D. Griffes
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided August 9, 1993No. 857, Docket 92-9062Published
1DissentVan Graafeiland, Circuit Judge
If my colleagues had decided to affirm the judgment of the district court, I would have been content to rest my concurrence on the well-written opinion of Chief Judge Parker reported at 801 F.Supp. 1282. However, because my colleagues have opted to reverse and their troublesome interpretation of the concepts of apportionment and internal consistency may lead to further review, I believe that I should state briefly why I believe that Chief Judge Parker was correct.
The State of .Vermont operates on the practical theory that resident owners of vehicles registered and operated in Vermont should…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Lindsley v. Natural Carbonic Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1911
- Quill Corp. v. North Dakota Ex Rel. HeitkampSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Wisconsin v. J. C. Penney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Container Corp. of America v. Franchise Tax BoardSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.