Smith v. Wheat
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Hart, C. J.,
(after stating the facts). It is the settled rule in equity in this State that conveyances to members of the household and to near relatives of an embarrassed debtor are looked upon with suspicion and scrutinized with care; and, when they are voluntary; they are prima facie fraudulent, and when the embarrassment of the debtor proceeds to financial wreck, they are presumed conclusively to be fraudulent as to existing creditors. Wilks v. Vaughan, 73 Ark. 174, 83 S. W. 913; Davis v. Cramer, 133 Ark. 244, 202 S. W. 239; Barham v. Federal Reserve Bank, 176 Ark. 1082, 5 S. W. (2d) 318;…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Kirby v. TallmadgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1896
- Wilks v. VaughanSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1904
- Davis v. CramerSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1918
- Miller v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
- Griggs v. Crane's TrusteeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1918
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- National Life Co. v. BrenneckeSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1938
- Broomfield v. BroomfieldSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1967
- Walsh v. FairheadSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1949
- Rutherford v. CaseySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
- Street Improvement District No. 359 v. Little RockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1934
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.