Legal Opinion

Hogue v. Johnson

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided July 30, 1999No. 80,950PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pierron, J.:

Craig E. Hogue appeals the district court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of Jeremy Johnson. The court found Hogue’s claim was barred by the statute of limitations due to untimely service of process on Johnson.

On April 13, 1995, Hogue and Johnson were involved in a two-car automobile accident which caused slight damage to both vehicles. Hogue waited to file suit against Johnson until April 10, 1997, 3 days prior to the expiration of the 2-year statute of limitations in K.S.A. 1996 Supp. 60-513. Pursuant to K.S.A. 60-203(a), Hogue had 90 days in which to obtain service on…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Slayden v. SixtaSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  2. Saliba v. Union Pacific RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1998
  3. Pope v. RansdellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1992
  4. McDonnell Ex Rel. McDonnell v. Music Stand, Inc.Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1994
  5. State v. MeyerCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1992

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lowe v. Surpas Resource Corp.District Court, D. Kansas · 2003
  2. Underhill v. ThompsonCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2007
  3. McGee v. HardinaColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. LE v. JoslinCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2009
  5. Finley v. Estate of De GrazioCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API