Legal Opinion

Howard v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 21, 1927No. 11268PublishedCited by 8 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

HAWKINS, Judge.

Conviction is for seduction, punishment being assessed, at two years in the penitentiary.

The third paragraph of the court’s charge reads as follows:

“3. Our law provides that no conviction can be had upon the testimony of the prosecutrix or female alleged to have been seduced, unless her testimony is corroborated by other evidence tending to connect the defendant with the offense charged. Two things are necessary to constitute this offense, viz.: carnal knowledge of the female and the promise of marriage upon the part of the defendant to obtain such carnal knowledge; and the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Boone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Adams v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  3. Garlas v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1905
  4. James v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  5. Gothard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1925

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Cuellar v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. La Fitte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Lafitte v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  4. Gann v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  5. Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API