Legal Opinion

Gann v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 2, 1928No. 11256Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

In his motion for rehearing appellant again complains at the reception of certain evidence. If exception was reserved to the court’s ruling upon such matters during the trial the complaint is not brought forward by proper bills. Apparently appellant sought to preserve the point by complaint in his motion for new trial. By an unbroken line of authority this cannot be done. Owens v. State, 4 Tex. Crim. App. 153; Herchenback v. State, 34 Tex. Crim. Rep., 122; Brazill v. State, 63 S. W. 130; McCasland v. State, 70 S. W. 547; Janca v. State, 56 Tex. Crim.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boone v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  2. Davis v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Howard v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API