Legal Opinion

Halford v. State

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided September 21, 2000No. CR 99-1246PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Robert L. Brown, Justice.

This is an appeal by appellant James Richard Halford from a judgment of conviction for aggravated robbery and a sentence of life imprisonment. Halford advances three grounds for appeal: (1) certain photographic evidence was cumulative, inflammatory, and unfairly prejudicial; (2) the trial court erred in disallowing defense counsel to cross-examine Patricia Payne on possible bias; and (3) victim-impact evidence presented during the sentencing phase was fundamentally unfair. We hold that none of these grounds warrants a reversal of the judgment, and we affirm.

The facts…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  2. Beed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
  3. Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
  4. Camargo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
  5. Leaks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
  2. Raymond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  3. Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
  4. DECAY v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
  5. Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API