Halford v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
Robert L. Brown, Justice.
This is an appeal by appellant James Richard Halford from a judgment of conviction for aggravated robbery and a sentence of life imprisonment. Halford advances three grounds for appeal: (1) certain photographic evidence was cumulative, inflammatory, and unfairly prejudicial; (2) the trial court erred in disallowing defense counsel to cross-examine Patricia Payne on possible bias; and (3) victim-impact evidence presented during the sentencing phase was fundamentally unfair. We hold that none of these grounds warrants a reversal of the judgment, and we affirm.
The facts…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Wicks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Beed v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1980
- Berry v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1986
- Camargo v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Leaks v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1999
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Thomas v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Raymond v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- Newman v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2003
- DECAY v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2009
- Brown v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2012
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.