Legal Opinion

United States v. Errol Douglas Cain, United States of America v. Paul Stephen Cain

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided January 26, 1998No. 96-4143, 96-4144PublishedCited by 34 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORRIS SHEPPARD ARNOLD, Circuit Judge.

Errol Cain and Paul Cain, who are brothers, both pleaded guilty in late 1995 to one count of conspiracy to commit mail fraud and one count of mail fraud. The conspiracy charge related to a scheme to induce several people to invest in the company that employed the defendants by knowingly misrepresenting to those people the return on the investment and the safety of the investment. The mail fraud count related to a letter sent to obtain the proceeds of an insurance policy owned by one investor. Errol Cain and Paul Cain were vice-presidents of the company.…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Tollett v. HendersonSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. United States v. LovascoSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. Michelle Ann BellCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1993

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by34 opinions

  1. United States v. Rene Ramirez-HernandezCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  2. United States v. Mark T. DavisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2006
  3. United States v. Steven D. BrawnerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. NewsomeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
  5. United States v. Frank A. M. LucaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API