United States v. Frank A. M. Luca
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
SINGLETON, District Judge:
Frank Luca (“Luca”) appeals his sentence imposed after he pleaded guilty to seventeen counts of mail fraud, interstate transport of stolen property and securities fraud in connection with a Ponzi scheme he ran. Luca contends that the district court erred in imposing three enhancements to his sentence. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We vacate Luca’s sentence and remand for re-sentencing.
I. STANDARD OF REVIEW
This court reviews de novo the district court’s interpretation and application of the sentencing guidelines. See United States v. Shrestha, 86…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Collins v. YoungbloodSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- United States v. DunniganSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. Earl Thomas AndersonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1991
- 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4598, 96 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7402 United States of America v. Prakash Man Shrestha, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- United States v. George Benitez Javier Ramirez Jose Camilo LizarragaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1994
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by28 opinions
- United States v. David Phillip Munoz Bennie E. McGregor Donald L. ThomsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
- United States v. AllenCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- United States v. Leigh Christina Miguel, United States of America v. Norman Jeremiah JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004
- United States v. Yeh, Hsin-YungCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2002
- United States v. Glenn Benton Finck, Also Known as Beau Lee DuboisCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2005
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.