Legal Opinion
Union Lumber Co. v. Industrial Accident Commission
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 29, 1932No. Docket No. 4675PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
THOMPSON (R. L.), J.
This is a petition for a writ of certiorari to review an award of damages which was rendered on account of injuries sustained by Sakari Palomaa in the course of his employment with the petitioner.
Sakari Palomaa, known as A. Palomaa, was employed by the petitioner on August 1, 1928, in its lumber camp . at Fort Bragg, as a laborer. On that date he received an injury consisting of a posterior dislocation of his left knee, as a result of being struck by a rolling log. The injury was sustained in the course of his employment. The petitioner carried its own accident insurance.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Pacific Coast Casualty Co. v. PillsburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- Henry Cowell Lime & Cement Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- Ocean Accident & Guarantee Corp. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- General Acc. Etc. Corp. v. Ind. Acc. Com.California Court of Appeal · 1926
- Hutchinson Lumber Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
3Cited by6 opinions
- Walker Mining Co. v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Lyydikainen v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1939
- Hustead v. H. E. Brown Timber Co.Idaho Supreme Court · 1932
- State Comp. Ins. Fund v. Workers' Comp. Appeals Bd.California Court of Appeal · 1977
- National Automobile Insurance v. Industrial Accident CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.