Legal Opinion
Texas Department of Aging & Disability Services v. Cannon
Court of Appeals of Texas
Decided July 19, 2012No. 14-11-00751-CVPublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
CHARLES W. SEYMORE, Justice.
In this interlocutory appeal, appellants, Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services a/k/a Brenham State School (“the Department”) and Anthony V. Watson, Dwane B. Hubbard, and Aretha L. Turner (collectively “the employees”), appeal the following orders in the underlying suit filed by appellee, Mary Cannon, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Patrick Tate Dyess: (1) an order denying the Department’s plea to the jurisdiction; (2) an order denying the Department’s motion to dismiss claims against the employees; and (3) an order denying…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Texas Department of Parks & Wildlife v. MirandaTexas Supreme Court · 2004
- Quern v. JordanSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Texas a & M University System v. KoseogluTexas Supreme Court · 2007
- University of Texas Medical Branch at Galveston v. Estate of Blackmon Ex Rel. ShultzTexas Supreme Court · 2006
- Villasan v. O'ROURKE, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Texas Department of Aging & Disability Services v. CannonTexas Supreme Court · 2015
- Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center - El Paso v. Gloria Bustillos, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)2018
- Michael v. Pishko, Individually and in His Official Capacity, N.K. Anand, Individually and in His Official Capacity, and Texas A&M University v. Dr. Lale Yurttas, Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)2013
- Texas Department of Aging and Disability Services A/K/A Brenham State School, Anthony v. Watson, Dwane B. Hubbard, and Aretha L. Turner v. Mary Cannon, Individually and as Representative of the Estate of Patrick Tate Dyess, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2015