Legal Opinion

Michael v. Pishko, Individually and in His Official Capacity, N.K. Anand, Individually and in His Official Capacity, and Texas A&M University v. Dr. Lale Yurttas

Texas Court of Appeals, 10th District (Waco)

Decided October 31, 2013No. 10-13-00029-CVPublished

1Opinion of the Court

IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-13-00029-CV MICHAEL V. PISHKO, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, N.K. ANAND, INDIVIDUALLY AND IN HIS OFFICIAL CAPACITY, AND TEXAS A&M UNIVERSITY, Appellants v. DR. LALE YURTTAS, Appellee From the 361st District Court Brazos County, Texas Trial Court No. 12-000579-CV-361 MEMORANDUM OPINION Lale Yurttas originally sued the Texas A&M University System, Texas A&M University, and two of its employees, Michael V. Pishko and N.K. Anand, in their official and individual capacities. She asserted a discrimination claim under Texas Labor Code section 21.051…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Mission Consolidated Independent School District v. GarciaTexas Supreme Court · 2008
  2. Texas Adjutant General's Office v. Michele NgakoueTexas Supreme Court · 2013
  3. Texas Bay Cherry Hill, L.P. v. City of Fort WorthCourt of Appeals of Texas · 2008
  4. Villasan v. O'ROURKE, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)2005
  5. Austin State Hospital v. GrahamTexas Supreme Court · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API