Harkcon, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER
SWEENEY, Judge
In this bid protest, plaintiff Harkcon, Inc. (“Harkcon”) challenges the award of a multi-year Indefinite Delivery Indefinite Quantity (“IDIQ”) Training and Analysis Support Services (“TASS”) contract by the United States Coast Guard (“Coast Guard”) to defendant-intervenor Metris, LLC (“Metris”). Currently before the court are the parties’ cross-motions for judgment on the administrative record. As explained below, because the court finds that the Coast Guard did not act arbitrarily, capriciously, or contrary to law, it denies Harkcon’s motion for judgment on the…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Camp v. PittsSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Bannum, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
- Impresa Construzioni Geom. Domenico Garufi v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Advanced Data Concepts, Incorporated v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2000
- Axiom Resource Management, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Accelgov, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2026
- Koam Engineering Services, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2023
- Oak Grove Technologies, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2021