Legal Opinion

Medley v. Canady

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided July 6, 1983No. Docket 59114PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtK. N. Sanborn, J.

Defendant Motorland Insurance Company appeals as of right from a judgment against it pursuant to the Uniform Trade Practices Act, MCL 500.2001 et seq.; MSA 24.12001 et seq.

Plaintiff Medley was injured in an automobile collision on October 24, 1977. Defendant William Canady reported the collision to defendant Motor-land on November 14, 1977. Plaintiff filed suit on December 9, 1977, but did not serve Canady until May 5, 1978. Canady then forwarded process to Motorland. Motorland received a police report on December 15, 1977. Motorland was added as a party defendant on January 14, 1980.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Tuttle v. Department of State HighwaysMichigan Supreme Court · 1976
  2. City of Wakefield v. Globe Indemnity Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1929
  3. Stath v. WilliamsIndiana Court of Appeals · 1977
  4. Fletcher v. Aetna Casualty & Surety Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1978
  5. O J Enterprises, Inc. v. Insurance Co. of North AmericaMichigan Court of Appeals · 1980

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Commercial Union Insurance v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1986
  2. McCahill v. Commercial Union InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1989
  3. Federal Insurance Company v. The Hartford Steam Boiler Inspection And Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005
  4. James D. Murphy and Rosemary Murphy v. The Cincinnati Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1985
  5. Burnside v. State Farm Fire and Casualty Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API